“Einstein’s Physics was exceptional but his Mathematics was pathetic” is
a statement my friend made. At first it seemed baffling as to how a Physicist
could possibly be poor in Mathematics. Later the same fellow told me that he
himself could not come to agree with this view. As Physics involves high level
Mathematics it is staggering to imagine how someone can come up with
breakthroughs without adequate facility with Mathematical thinking. Put
mathematical thinking in quotes and you get the answer. ‘Mathematical thinking’
is different from the subject ‘Mathematics’ as we know it. What is the difference?
Mathematical thinking is a way of finding out insights. It is an
approach towards unravelling, conceiving or demystifying a riddle, a form or a
problem. It is not exactly common sense logic. It has its rigour and its flavour.
Mathematics as a subject makes use of Mathematical thinking. There are
operations involved in Mathematics such as Arithmetic operations. It is quite
possible for a Physicist to have conceptual insights in Physics and still
struggle in Mathematics. These conceptual insights are based on aspects of the
physical world. His Mathematical thinking may help him arrive at some
conjectures about the physical world. When it comes to Mathematical
calculations, such a person can experience difficulty as it is a matter of understanding
conventions. Concepts and conventions are not the same.
Physics attempts to explain the physical real world based on spatial
elements that are unique to the subject. The spatial elements are restricted to
the real world as we see it. The scope of our understanding depends on our perception
and Mathematical work.
Mathematics is abstract. Its abstraction is insulated from the real
world and the implications are articulated with reference to the real world.
There is free play possible because it takes you beyond the real to the
conceptual and imaginary.
In physics, the physical world context takes the student in a direction
which gets descriptive and theoretical. The abstraction is an articulation of
insight in natural language.
For example; ‘light’ is a natural phenomenon. It may be represented by a
notation or a symbol in Mathematics. This representation is a trait of
Mathematical thinking. Mathematical thinking is a form of approach different
from intuitive logic. The arguments follow a ‘formal’ structure unlike those in
our conversations.
In Physics, ‘light’ is both a phenomenon and a trait. In Mathematics it
could be a noumenon. A noumenon is an idea, subject or insight known without
sensory perception. This means that our sensory perception can be limited and
deceptive. A physicist recognizes this and uses a Mathematical approach to
overcome the limitations of spatial dimensions. Granted that a light year is
the distance traveled by light in one year, the star that you see may actually
be dead. The light from the star may have taken several years to reach the
earth. The star may have died by the time the light reaches the earth. What you
see is the light of a dead star. Looks like dead stars leave impacts for us to
see. Don’t mistake the light for a star.
Going beyond the restricted sense of perception....The last paragraph encapsulates your point so well. I really enjoyed reading this insightful post....go beyond the horizon of limited perceptions!
ReplyDelete